| 31319 |
Fernando Osvaldo Socorro Furtado Moreira |
DEGI |
A |
|
|
|
|
| Complete with website and photo. Research on project portfolio management and decision analysis under uncertainty. Professional background in corporate environment noted. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Strong abstract that follows the structure. Clearly explains the two types of synergy being modeled. The visual abstract shows Background, Methods, and Results with appropriate diagrams and case study information. |
A+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 reviews all excellent quality |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Presenting another person's work which is always hard. Ouline is not needed for a 10 mins presentation. Overall the pace and the pitch are good. Too much time in the introduction. It would be good to have a strong example in the beggining of the presentation and then take it fro there. But overall the presentation is good. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 49680 |
João Pedro Taveira Pinto da Silva |
DEEC |
B- |
|
|
|
|
| Incomplete submission. Website provided but research title and description are listed as "TBD" (To Be Determined). Supervisors listed but the core requirement of describing is missing. |
B- |
NA |
B- |
|
|
|
|
| Table of contents is not needed this is not a report, rather a presentsation. The overall problem is well presented but then you show two graphs. Same with the following slides which are complicated. The flow of the presentation is also monotone which makes it harder to follow. generally the presentation flow slike a report not a pitch. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 76128 |
Manuel Bogarim Bento dos Santos |
DEEC |
A+ |
|
|
|
|
| Excellent submission. Website provided, comprehensive research description. Background story about ISTSat-1 project adds context and personality. Slide is well-organized with background, thesis description, and supervisors. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Solid abstract that follows structure naturally. The visual abstract effectively combines background, methodology schematic, and conclusions in a clear layout. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 mixed reviews |
A- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Motivation was good. This is not your work so like many others it makes the pitch harder. Before you go into Dopplr you should have explained what are the contributions of the paper. Actually the exanple is interesting what if your presentation started with this? Then you could state the contribution to close the performance gap between single pass and mutiple pass...nobody wants to read equations you're just showing that you can do it not explaining the paper... Long presentation of experimental results… |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 78844 |
Luís Fernando Dias Bucho |
DEEC |
A |
|
|
|
|
| Complete with website and photo. Research on superconducting induction-synchronous machines for aircraft applications. Academic background and interests nicely organized. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Well-structured abstract for a technical engineering paper. Follows the format appropriately and stays concise. The visual abstract is comprehensive with clear sections for Challenges, Methodology, Experimental setup, and Results, including data tables and graphs. Good execution overall. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 very good reviews |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Motivation was long and hard to understand what is the problem and what are the contribtions of the paper. Methods section was very good well presented and detailed. Slide layout could be improved sometimes its better to have multiple slides as opposed to have animations with smaller figures / text (in a not so good room or projection situation this can make a difference). Experimental results also good. Case studyt comes too late into the presentation. For instance this could be a good way to start the presentation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 84415 |
Pedro Ricardo Neto Mendes |
DEEC |
A |
|
|
|
|
| Complete with website and photo. Research on entangling measures to power quantum communication protocols. Paper chosen included. Slide is clean and informative. |
A- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Well-structured abstract for a quantum paper under review. Concise and follows the format. The visual abstract effectively uses a simple diagram contrasting nighttime and daytime quantum communication scenarios. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 very good reviews |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Good start introducing the problem (perhaps too much information), since the problem if complex perhaps starting with the wiretap model or an example to make it more clear, you mention you improved on previous work but you actually don't describe that, positioning against the SoA could be better, slide layout could be improved by removing some decorations that don't add much (like squares around options), good closing this is a hard topic and you did a good job in presenting it clearly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 87436 |
Alina Chervinska |
DEAmb |
A- |
|
|
|
|
| Complete with website and photo. Research on environmental impacts assessment of food products, particularly beef. |
A- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The visual abstract effectively shows the biophysical model structure with inputs, key findings, and applications for agro-food land use modeling. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 very good reviews |
A- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Presenting another person's work. Questios answered is a long slide could have been better, how it works is actually better, scenarios are good, you're missing a narrative for your presentation, for instance you could have presented the overall scenarios first and then unwrap them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 89691 |
Leonardo Pedroso Duarte |
DEAer |
A |
|
|
|
|
| Complete with website and photo. Research on distributed control and estimation of ultra large-scale control systems. Clear problem statement and research direction. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Abstract follows structure and explains rationale. Visual absract is well designed. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 very good reviews |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Good motivation, Misses contributions at the beggening of the presentation, good pace and visuals, states clearly contributions at the end. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 89815 |
Jorge Filipe Cerejo |
DEEC |
A- |
|
|
|
|
| Clean slide design with photo, clear research description on multimodal representation learning for patient similarity in hospital care. Website provided. |
A- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Strong abstract following the structure. Technical content is well-explained with specific metrics. The visual abstract matches the written content and highlights key sections of the abstract effectively. |
A+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 excellent reviews |
A- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The presentation was a mix of adapting the paper to a wide audience (which is good) and trying to present na actual paper. Some slides are very cluttered. Too descriprive and less of building up a narrative. Results come too late into the presentation and presented in a cluttered slide with a long hard to read table. Results are good although all of the graphs in one single sldie are hard to read and interpret. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 93398 |
Maria Beatriz Soares Lopes da Costa |
DEFT |
A |
|
|
|
|
| Complete with website and photo. Research on quantum hacking and QKD security. Educational timeline and supervisors clearly shown. |
A+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Excellent abstract that follows the format precisely. Technical content is well-explained for the intended audience. The visual abstract effectively shows the attack mechanism, main findings, and contributions in a clean layout. |
B+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 good reviews |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Good presentation, hard topic to introduce and you did a good job in motivating the work (perhaps a bit long). 5 mins and you're still not focussing on the contribution of the paper. You try to justify the novelty of the work which usually a sign something is not OK. Results are presented when you're almost out of time... You conclude with "The Main drawback..." which is like shoorting yourself in the foot. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 95736 |
Beatriz Maria Estevens Canaverde |
DEIC |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
| 95804 |
João Maria Henriques da Silva Félix Mendes |
DEAer |
A |
|
|
|
|
| Complete with website and photo. Research on UAV trajectory planning for unknown dynamic object reconstruction is clearly described. Supervisors listed. |
A+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Strong abstract with clear structure. The visual abstract effectively combines the challenge description, framework components, and achieved results with both simulation and real-world imagery. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 very good reviews |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Good innitial pitch and motivation, gets to the contribution early before connection to the SoA, if anything try to use a simpler design (for instance you use too much bold fonts), I liked the diagram explaining the approach, avoid "the problem with ...", when you present both approaches try to identify more clearly the baseline, good real-world experiment perhaps this could be the first slide where you pitch the contribution and then unwrap to the details, conclusion slide could be better too much text. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 96112 |
André Sampaio Pereira |
DEMat |
A |
|
|
|
|
| Complete with website and photo. Research on functionally graded materials based on refractory high-entropy alloys for nuclear fusion. Clear thesis title and goal statement. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Strong abstract with specific results. The visual abstract shows motivation, problem, solution process, and conclusion effectively. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 very good reviews |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Very good presentation, well motivated, slides very well structured and designed, the presentation also flows well. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 96115 |
Diogo Sampaio Pereira |
DEMat |
A- |
|
|
|
|
| Complete with website and photo. Research on oxidation behavior of boron for nuclear fusion applications. Detailed explanation of why chosen paper is relevant to research provided. |
A- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Well-rewritten abstract following the format. The visual abstract effectively shows the key finding about boron percentage affecting deuterium retention. |
B+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 mixed reviews |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Very good presentation, well motivated, slides very well structured and designed, the presentation also flows well. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 96501 |
Afonso Romão Júlio Guerreiro |
DEFT |
A |
|
|
|
|
| Complete with website and photo. Research on multi-leg two-loop scattering for LHC physics. Educational background, supervisors, and professional experience included. Well-designed slide. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Strong abstract for theoretical physics. Contextualizes the work within LHC precision era needs. The visual abstract is clean with Overview, Applications, and Numerical Results sections. |
B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 reviews, 2 good, one V good |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Presenting another person's work which is always hard in terms of building a narrative. You should start by presenting the contribution. Overall good presentation in terms of layout speech and organization / structure. The example is actually a good one perhaps starting with that. You discuss the contributions later in the methods this should be specifically mentioned at the beggining. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 96557 |
Nuno Miguel Matos Torgo Gonçalves |
DEIC |
A |
|
|
|
|
| Complete submission. Website provided. Research on co-design of models and algorithms for efficient foundation model training is clearly stated. Supervisors listed. |
A+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Strong abstract that naturally integrates the structure. The visual abstract is well-designed with clear sections for Overview, Method, and Conclusion, including a diagram and performance graph. Good balance between technical detail and accessibility. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 excellent reviews |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Good presentation, very clear introduction and notivation. Also good visuals and layour and structure. If anything you're missing a strong start with the contribution rather than a narrative that tries to explain the paper and not pitch. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 102122 |
Lourenço Isidro do Carmo Neiva Mourão |
DEIC |
A |
|
|
|
|
| Complete with website and photo. Research on ML-based collision detection for smooth convex shapes is described. Educational background and supervisors clearly shown. |
A+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Excellent abstract that demonstrates sophisticated understanding of the structure. The writing flows naturally while covering all required elements. The broader perspective is particularly strong, connecting to practical applications. The visual abstract clearly shows the problem, framework, and results with appropriate diagrams. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 excellent reviews |
A+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Stellar presentation, great visuals, very good motivaton which then unfolds into a great presentation where the visuals go together with the narrative and build a very compelling argument. Congrats. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 102380 |
Manuel Pedro Garcia Neto |
DEEC |
A |
|
|
|
|
| Complete with website and photo. Research on droop control integration for DC networks is clearly explained. Slide includes supervisor and research lab information. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The visual abstract is provided but the written abstract is not visible. The visual abstract covers Motivation, Method, Results, and Conclusion sections with appropriate diagrams and data. |
B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 good reviews |
B+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Good pitch the work is easy to motivate but you're still reading the slides which is something you can improve if you keep rehearsing. Too much time to present the Gap. The algorithm explanation is tedious, you should try and be able to present these things more clearly without going into the details. Same fo the use case which is a very small diagram (hard to reada) you can't even see it yourself. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 109197 |
Arda Eren Poyraz |
DEQ |
A- |
|
|
|
|
| Complete with website and photo. Research on photo-charging supercapacitors via broadband harvesting. Detailed technical description provided. |
A+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Excellent abstract with specific metrics. Follows the structure well with clear problem statement, solution, and results. The visual abstract is comprehensive with mechanism diagrams and integration demonstrations. |
A+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 excellent reviews |
A- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Not your paper and a very compliex topic which makes things not easy. But you actually managed to build a nice motivation. Double dots on the slide (these small details are important they show some sloppiness - like you copied / pasted fdrom somewhere). Too much focus on details and less on the contributions. You're explaining the paper not pitching the contributions. The breakthourgh performance metrics this is a good example of how you could have started the presentation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 111922 |
Gustavo Dinis Venturinha Cercas Lopes Jacinto |
DEEC |
A |
|
|
|
|
| Complete with website and photo. Research on on-board real-time synthetic aperture radar processing using neural networks. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Well-written abstract that follows the structure. Good use of specific results. Covers the broader perspective with real-world applications. The visual abstract is simple but effective, showing the dataset and results clearly. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 very good reviews |
A- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Good opening. This is not your work which makes it hard. The slide design could be better and the examples which are very concrete culd be used to make the presentation more visual (you present multiple small images you could have moved one per slide and show more detail). The Baseline Data images are graet and once again if you worked visually these could be a great way to make the presentation more flahly. Is the dataset flow really necessary for a 10mins presentation? Too much details on the results its better to choose a couple of examples instead of trying to do all. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 111948 |
Maryam Karimi |
DMat |
A |
|
|
|
|
| Complete submission with photo. Research on durability of iridium-based electrocatalysts using advanced electron microscopy. Supervisor and research lab information included. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The visual abstract is comprehensive, showing the research on water electrolysis and catalyst degradation with appropriate imagery and flow. |
A+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 very good reviews |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Very good presenration well motrivated and structures, no need to have na outline examples are well illlustrated although sometimes leading to clusttered slides. Overall it is a very good presentation to a complex problems. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 114952 |
Anton Tolstonogov |
DEEC |
A |
|
|
|
|
| Complete with webpage, LinkedIn, and photo. Research on decentralized marine environment inspection and mapping using underwater robots. Clear problem statement and application focus. |
A+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Excellent abstract for an under-review paper. Follows the structure precisely. Technical content is well-balanced. The visual abstract is comprehensive, showing the problem setup, method (LM-DDRS approach), and results for both accuracy and robustness. |
B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 good reviews |
A- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| No need for na outline for a 10mins presentation. Motivation slide is good but perhaps too cluttered, the slides on problem are very cluttered and the presentation dense you risk loosing the audience here... Also these slides repear the title and subtitle on the top. Halfway into the presentation you're still not trying to score... overall too much information and a very dense presentation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 115143 |
Belarmino Gomes Mendes Tavares |
DEFT |
A- |
|
|
|
|
| Complete with website (CiênciaVitae) and photo. Research on radiation effects in III-nitride semiconductors. Supervisors and research description included. |
B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Abstract follows structure. Visual abstract too cluttered and hard to understand. |
B- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 average reviews |
A- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Very good presentation, clear motivation and structure. However, you need to improve your english communication skills, this requires, practice, practice, practice, force yourself to be with international colleagues and speak in english reherse before going into a public presentsation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 115224 |
Ahmed Yassin Elsayed Ibrahim |
DEGI |
A- |
|
|
|
|
| omplete with website and photo. Research on digital manufacturing and supply chain transformation. Professional background in consulting and industry experience included. |
B+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Visual abstract shows AI-enabled Lean Six Sigma methodology with clear sections for Purpose, Methodology, and Results including model performance metrics. |
D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 poor reviews |
A- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Systematic review paper, which is always hard to present. You should have started why is this review needed (i.e. tehre was not review before? Is there something new?), going directly into the clusters is perhaps too early in the second slide, specially because the slide is too cluttered, the RQ skude us actualy good so perhaps this should be slide 2. Methodology is also good but the lower trable doesn't add much you can just have 1. Thematic, 2. Ciation impact, etc. The following slides are also a buit cluttered which makes you focus on too much detail and not making the narrative flow. The results slide has the same issue, i.e., the table at the bottom is unreadable and doesn't add anything. Closing could be stronger with a slide and a couple of lines not another cluttered one. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 115747 |
Mohanna Mousabeigi |
DEIC |
A |
|
|
|
|
| Complete submission with two website links provided. Research on graph neural networks and topological data analysis is well-described. Includes supervisors and latest work summary. |
B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Paper information is provided with clear citation, DOI, and code repository. The visual abstract shows the method, inputs, applications, and results with appropriate graphs. |
A- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 very good reviews |
B- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| You have issues with english so its hard to evaluate what works on the presentation and what is actually na issue with the narrative and the presentation structure. My overall recommendation is that you need to improve your communication skills as this might impact your ability to present your work which hs a very relevant issue in a PhD. The only way to do this (apart from taking ccmm skill classes) is to actually practice, practice, practice and engage in conversations and meetings with other colleagues and peers. Regarding the presentation you took too much time to explain what us a PhyloVAE and by the time you got to the content of the paper it was already byond half of your time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 115754 |
Luis Eduardo Piedra Marin |
DEMat |
A |
|
|
|
|
| Complete with website and photo. Research on atomic-scale defects in 2D Dirac materials using aberration-corrected STEM. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Abstract and visual abstract provided. The visual abstract shows a clear workflow from defects through scattergram analysis to ML model. Technical content is appropriate for materials science. |
C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 average reviews |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Good presentation, the topic is too far of my area of expertise but I enjoyed the presentation which was well designed and motivated. If anything it would be good to know what is the contirbution in the beggining of the presentation. Then you go from there to explain the details. Even during the presentation its not clear what are the contributions of this paper and how they advance the SoA. Overall a very good presentation that could be slightly improved if the contributions are more clear from the beggining. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 115852 |
Sidnei Ramos Da Cruz |
DEIC |
A |
|
|
|
|
| Complete submission with photo, website and clear research description on knowledge-infused learning for deforestation detection in tropical forests. Google Scholar profile also provided. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Rewritten abstract improved over original version. Visual abstract is simple but good (and hard) for a theoretical paper. |
A- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 very good reviews |
B+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| competent presentation but you need to work on your pace and rythm it seemed you were reding, Overall the structure, design and layout were good (oftentime cluettered) but its reallt the presentation skills that you need to work on. This requires training, training and more taining. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 116228 |
Marta Alexandra Ferreira Gamboa |
DERT |
A |
|
|
|
|
| Complete with website and photo. Research on criteria for mineral deposit boundaries in exploration rights allocation. Practical industry experience context provided. |
B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Text abstract is a sequence of statements needs to be improved. Visual abstract is good. |
NA |
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
| 116360 |
Renato de Sousa Marcelo |
DEIC |
A |
|
|
|
|
| Complete submission. Website provided. Research on machine-learning approach to forensic age estimation. Includes supervisor information and project context. |
A+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The abstract addresses a theoretical computer science topic effectively. Follows the structure with clear problem statement and findings. Word count appears appropriate. The visual abstract shows the logical flow from Description Logics setup through reasoning to decidability analysis. |
A- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 very good reviews |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Presenting another person works wich is always hard. Good motivation with concepts. Good explanatgion of what is minimal model, visual and insightful. Good lay0ut and structure good use of minimal template without colours and flashy things. This works. Intuition also works. Practical takeaways are also good and even better if they were connected to an innitial pitch that relates to this. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 119093 |
Waqar Ahmad |
DERT |
A- |
|
|
|
|
| Complete submission with CERENA profile, Google Scholar, and detailed biography. Research on sustainable resource engineering and digital transformation for critical raw materials. |
A- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Good abstract covering geostatistical and deep learning methods. Includes specific results. The visual abstract integrates within the document. |
B- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 mixed low reviews |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Solid presentation no need for TOC and many slides are too cluttered and too much details for a paper presentaion (for instance materials and methods is too long and dertailed). Good section on results and discussion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 119218 |
Jakub Franciszek Skiba |
DERT |
A- |
|
|
|
|
| Complete with URL and photo. Research on energy reduction in raw materials extraction using stochastic algorithms. MSCA Doctoral Network context provided. |
B+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The visual abstract shows the paper on stochastic optimization with preconcentration. Abstract structure visible with labeled sections. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 very good reviews |
B+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Complicated topic even the title slide is scary (too much and liong tex - hard ot read) . Good movation which again could have been better if you started with the contributions. You spend too much time explaning what is stochastic mine planning is this somethign that peioke in a conference in the field should know? Case study which is more easily understandable could be presented earlier. Objective function slide with a formaula that is hard to read is this really the only way to explain. Once again reinforcement learning is a basic concept this is not needed to explain in a paper. You get to the results already afrer the time if this was in a conference with a strict time you would have been out. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 119252 |
Lara Sofia Pinto Sá Neves |
DEIC |
A |
|
|
|
|
| Complete submission. Website provided. Research focuses on world models and agent models with emphasis on uncertainty quantification. Advisors listed |
B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The abstract follows the 7-part structure explicitly and labels each section. The structure is clear but the explicit labeling makes it read more like a template exercise than a polished abstract. No visual abstract was submitted in the visible materials. |
C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 good reviews |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Very good presentation, well motivated, slides very well structured and designed, the presentation also flows well. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 119271 |
Seyed Amir Afzali Fatatouei |
DERT |
A |
|
|
|
|
| Complete with website and photo/CV. Research on deep learning methods (PINN) for characterizing mine tailings using drone geophysics. Extensive CV with achievements and skills. |
B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Strong abstract that naturally integrates the structure. The visual abstract is missing perhaps there was a misunderstanding between the written abstract and a visual coloured version which is not a visual abstract. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Workshop Co-Chair, did some OK reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Slow intro, used video from others work, too long to get to the paper contribution, not clear what is the problem and the contribution halfway into the presentation, you get to the details too late in the presentation and you're not focussing on the core contribution but getting lost into the details. You get to the rresults 2 mins to the end of the presentation. Conclusions are good. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 96755 |
Mafalda Da Costa Veigas |
DMD |
A |
|
|
|
|
| Complete submission with Notion page. Research on interactive technologies and digital media for promoting physical activity among children. Educational timeline included. |
A- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Paper citation is complete. The visual abstract is comprehensive, showing participants, method, AR design principles, and outcomes in a clear educational design format. |
A+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Workshop Co-Chair very proactive and responsive |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Good opening slide motivating the research. Pace is a bit slow but confident. Visually the presention is strong. The issue is really not opening with a clear statement of contributions. Even in the conclusions its not clear. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 115070 |
Joana Marta Laranjeira de Faria Pais |
DMD |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
| 115725 |
Xuecong Li |
DMD |
A- |
|
|
|
|
| Complete submission with website. Research on direct 3D authoring based on Gaussian splatting is described. Supervisors listed. |
A- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Abstract covers the structure but could be improved, visual abstract also too much details and fina print with figures hard to understand. |
A- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 mixed good reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 115953 |
Fabio de Almeida |
DMD |
B+ |
|
|
|
|
| Submitted later but well designed and done. Missing personal webpage. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Own paper covering speculative design. The abstract follows the structure well with clear methodology (collaborative autoethnography and fabulation) and three metaphorical figures. The visual abstract clearly maps Problem, Methodology, and Proposal with relevant diagrams. |
B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 good reviews |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Good opening slide motivating the research. Same for infrastucture. You are reading which means you didnt practice enough. AI in relation to space good way to present the RQ. You're missing a more clear description of the contribtutions of the paper. You go back to the RQs which is a bit confusing. The process (metaphor driven design research) works. Perhaps divive into three sldies. The Noticing diagram is unredeadble. This is an ongoing paper which makes it harder to present aas concluded material. The metaphor slide again could be a sequence of slides, one showing the theee components, then one for each component with less text. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 119082 |
Sheila Correia Ramos |
DMD |
A |
|
|
|
|
| Complete with two websites and photo. Research on non-linear narratives in web documentaries and video games for gender awareness. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Complete abstract that tells a compelling narrative about the research. Follows the structure while maintaining engagement. The visual abstract uses a creative layout with numbered sections matching the abstract structure. Good integration of research and artistic elements. |
C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| only one good review |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Very good presenration, there was a clear effort to improve from the previous assingments. If anything making a better pitch of the contributions. The visuals and structure is very well done. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 119091 |
Pedro Daniel das Neves Pereira |
DMD |
A |
|
|
|
|
| Complete submission with photo. Research on exhibitions in small/medium museums using AI, AR, and transmedia storytelling. Background and supervisors included. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Well structured abstract following the suggestions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Visual abstract only which is well designed missing the actual text abstract. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 good / v. good reviews |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Good intro and great visuals. Very good introduction and motivation but lacks what is the contribution of the paper? Apart from the context what is the paper contributing? Simoky describing the exhebiution? This is na artefact contribution so then you could start with showing the example of the new exhbition and then take us down the process. Methodoloigy, it would be good to have a visual map of the exhbition and not a list of Room A, B, etc. Was there a nararative for the intervention what was this narrative? This is a clear example of reversing the presentation would work. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 193072 |
Gonçalo Gomes |
DEIC |
A |
|
|
|
|
| Complete submission with website. Research on image captioning evaluation metrics is well-contextualized with personal journey from engineering to AI research. Publications section included. |
A- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The abstract is comprehensive and follows the structure, There are some grammatical issues. The visual abstract is colorful and informative, showing the method workflow and comparison charts effectively. |
C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 good reviews |
A- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Introduction slides was not explaining what is the contribution of the paper. Presenting the paper of others which is hard to build a narrative. You go back and forth during the results whic is a bit strange. RECAP is usually something that you don't do in a paper presentation... what are you recapping? Case studies have also the same problem a bit confusoing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 430162 |
Lavinia Rossini |
DMD |
A- |
|
|
|
|
| Complete with website (Wix page) and photo. Research on posthuman narrative environments with AI, embodiment, and biophilia in museums. Supervisors and affiliations included. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Paper citation provided with DOI. The visual abstract shows both the written abstract and a visual representation of the research flow. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 mixed reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matteo Capello |
DMD |
NA |
|
|
|
|
| This appears to be Assignment #2 content (visual abstract) rather than Assignment #1 slide submission. The Assignment #1 slide is not clearly visible in the document. |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Interesting approach of showing both the old and revised abstract for comparison, which demonstrates understanding of the structure's value. Visual abstract created. This is a pedagogically useful submission. |
NA |
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sebastião Amaro |
|
|
|
|
|
17 |